Although you would never know it if you watch corporate media its all coming apart now. The evidence surrounding the vaccine efficacy, media censorship VAERS data, VAERS data coverup and much more is emerging from the shadows.
Now the question is does the concept of Noble Truth justify the terrible price paid by the innocent victims.
Aid agencies are reporting 150,000.000 tertiary dead(not confirmed) due to lockdowns and corporate driven management of the pandemic(opinion).
Early in 2020 some very brave and innocent doctors/scientists testified and informed the American Congress and the CDC/FDA/WHO of alternatives. Doctors of renown, heavily credentialed and experienced in their fields, doctors that had the scientific weight to demand attention.
Looking rearward it seems clear now the corporate strategy did not include any alternate form of attack but the highly profitable gene therapy incorrectly called vaccine. Hence the need for the Noble Truth narrative.
In Canada, cars lined up for PCR testing which we now know/believe was over cycled, to drive the numbers(only my opinion)
Imagine what this pandemic would have looked like if, as an example caplets of Ivermectin were made available at the same time as the drive in PCR program. I am told Ivermectin is so safe the dosages can be approximate. Lets say each PCR tester had a selection of caplets for 100 - 150 lbs 150-200lbs 200 -300lbs etc.. just given as prophylactic. Instead of what actually happened, go home let it develop and if to the point of serious symptomology go the hospital.
Another band of techs specialize in nursing homes distributing ivermectin in roughly the same manor. Possibly at the same time delivering nasal irrigation devices/products and basic training to the staff. Depending on the size of the home a nasal wash every 2nd-3rd day, would that have helped. How many seniors would have been saved dying alone and terrified. Did you have a senior die alone.
Hi Shawn, those are great questions. And, as the FLCCC doctors have said - in a pandemic, if an already approved medication has some chance of working, and it is safe, it is unethical to not try it, especially if there are no alternatives. Yet, that is what our health authorities did. In Australia, the TGA (equivalent of the FDA) restricted doctors from prescribing ivermectin off label, and in some states, doctors could be charged or heavily fined for prescribing HCQ off label. These are two of the oldest, and safest medicines available. Fluvoxamine, is also safe to take under a doctor's supervision. That these medicines would be banned or ignored in favour of a novel gene based technology "vaccine" that has limited testing and unknown long term safety data is in my mind, bordering on criminal negligence, at the very least. See my article "Boosters in the time of Omicron" where I unpack the limited data that the ATAGI used to base their recommendations regarding boosters on, which translated into mandates for workers in certain industries, such as health care where I work. The dissonance is remarkable. 100+ studies on ivermectin are not good enough but a handful of observational studies on mRNA vaccines over a few months are somehow.
Thanks for that you make a valid point. The EUA hinged on there being no available treatment. If Ivermectin had been in use from at least December 2020 when Dr. Kory made his impassioned plea in that infamous senate video, there would have been no case to rush the vaccines through, which would have resulted in a great loss of potential revenue for the pharmaceutical companies. That is not a theory, that is fact.
World
Has a crime been committed, what do you think.
shawn
9 hr ago
Although you would never know it if you watch corporate media its all coming apart now. The evidence surrounding the vaccine efficacy, media censorship VAERS data, VAERS data coverup and much more is emerging from the shadows.
Now the question is does the concept of Noble Truth justify the terrible price paid by the innocent victims.
Aid agencies are reporting 150,000.000 tertiary dead(not confirmed) due to lockdowns and corporate driven management of the pandemic(opinion).
Early in 2020 some very brave and innocent doctors/scientists testified and informed the American Congress and the CDC/FDA/WHO of alternatives. Doctors of renown, heavily credentialed and experienced in their fields, doctors that had the scientific weight to demand attention.
Looking rearward it seems clear now the corporate strategy did not include any alternate form of attack but the highly profitable gene therapy incorrectly called vaccine. Hence the need for the Noble Truth narrative.
In Canada, cars lined up for PCR testing which we now know/believe was over cycled, to drive the numbers(only my opinion)
Imagine what this pandemic would have looked like if, as an example caplets of Ivermectin were made available at the same time as the drive in PCR program. I am told Ivermectin is so safe the dosages can be approximate. Lets say each PCR tester had a selection of caplets for 100 - 150 lbs 150-200lbs 200 -300lbs etc.. just given as prophylactic. Instead of what actually happened, go home let it develop and if to the point of serious symptomology go the hospital.
Another band of techs specialize in nursing homes distributing ivermectin in roughly the same manor. Possibly at the same time delivering nasal irrigation devices/products and basic training to the staff. Depending on the size of the home a nasal wash every 2nd-3rd day, would that have helped. How many seniors would have been saved dying alone and terrified. Did you have a senior die alone.
Was this a crime or just bad management
Shawn663
Hi Shawn, those are great questions. And, as the FLCCC doctors have said - in a pandemic, if an already approved medication has some chance of working, and it is safe, it is unethical to not try it, especially if there are no alternatives. Yet, that is what our health authorities did. In Australia, the TGA (equivalent of the FDA) restricted doctors from prescribing ivermectin off label, and in some states, doctors could be charged or heavily fined for prescribing HCQ off label. These are two of the oldest, and safest medicines available. Fluvoxamine, is also safe to take under a doctor's supervision. That these medicines would be banned or ignored in favour of a novel gene based technology "vaccine" that has limited testing and unknown long term safety data is in my mind, bordering on criminal negligence, at the very least. See my article "Boosters in the time of Omicron" where I unpack the limited data that the ATAGI used to base their recommendations regarding boosters on, which translated into mandates for workers in certain industries, such as health care where I work. The dissonance is remarkable. 100+ studies on ivermectin are not good enough but a handful of observational studies on mRNA vaccines over a few months are somehow.
Thanks for that you make a valid point. The EUA hinged on there being no available treatment. If Ivermectin had been in use from at least December 2020 when Dr. Kory made his impassioned plea in that infamous senate video, there would have been no case to rush the vaccines through, which would have resulted in a great loss of potential revenue for the pharmaceutical companies. That is not a theory, that is fact.